Related topics

Vista security flaw?
Paul P...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista security Hello everyone, I have an idea that I think would really help improve Vista security. At the same time, it would make Vista run faster and take up less space, and it would make things more difficult for malicious hackers.

Microsoft partners fume over Vista security
PeterC@NickelCap PeterCNickel...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista security Looks like this OneCare and Windows Security Center issue is a case of a lack of communication from the OneCare team. It also looks like it is considered normal by some see

Vista Security - Worse than XP?
Alun Jones [MS-MVP - Windows Security] a...@texis.invalid microsoft public security microsoft public windows vista security I'd suggest asking the folks that make QualysGuard. Clearly, Vista is not Windows 95, and isn't vulnerable to many of the thhings being checked for. A lot of vulnerability scanners test for

Vista security flaw?
It's theoretically possible that the code has a bug that allows users to breach the security and get the unencrypted bits out. In fact from the long history of broken security schemes like this, discovery of such a bug is a near certainty. What happens next is Microsoft sends out some instructions to Vista (sort of

Vista security
And so the security wars will continue with Vista. It's got nothing to do with market share...it has everything to do with OS design. You really think Mac's OS, Linux etc. is more secure than Microsoft's? In some ways, yes. In other ways, no. NTFS is a better security design than any filesystem commonly shipping

Windows Vista security program update problem
ONly ONE person uses this computer, so it runs in Administrator security all the time. Should I have visitors, and they want to use the computer, they are monitored, and I check what they did, and where the went (on the internet) after they leave. Should they have been to suspicious sites, they aren't allowed to

Vista security
MuahMan muah...@yahoo.com microsoft public security comp os linux advocacy comp sys mac advocacy Moron alert. IE7 and Google groups work fine!

Can't get insertion strings from Vista security events using V
... 27 Dec 2006 11:00:26 -0500 Cynicor <j...tru.p.....@speak.ea.sy.net> wrote: Jer wrote: After much discussion, looks like we didn't have that long to wait after all. http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/26/microsoft.security.ap/index.htm l Social engineering flaw, not Vista security flaw. Tell the truth.

Games developer whines about Vista security restrictions
"We discovered a number of implementation flaws that continued to allow a full machine compromise to occur," Matthew Conover, principal security researcher at Symantec, wrote in the report titled "Attacks against Windows Vista's Security Model." The report was made available to Symantec customers last week and is

Vista security claim challenged
BC callm...@gmail.com comp security misc Sebastian Gottschalk wrote: BC wrote: Symantec and McAfee are complaining about being locked out of certain kernel processes in the new upcoming version of Windows, Vista: http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1882019,00.html

Vista x32 IE7 SSL Security Problem
Sample code that demonstrates the vulnerability has already been posted on the Web, McAfee said in a security alert sent to customers. "Malware exploiting this vulnerability has been observed in the wild," the security company said in the alert This is the first Vista security flaw to have known malware in the wild

Microsoft Collaborated with the NSA on Vista Security?
Anyway, I did read from a Vista window that firewalls conflict with each other and only one should be used. I guess Norton AV 2007 is including a firewall now? So I'm not surprised that it isn't playing nicely with Vista Security Center and turned it off. How can I get Vista to recognize NAV2007 and thus not

Mac V Vista security.
midway mid...@home.net microsoft public windows vista security "The retail version of Norton can play havoc with your PC" What are you basing this on, 2006-back? It is clear you haven't used '07-up. Stop the bashing and try to help the poster. Other programs have messed SecCenter up as well, either it is a bug or

Security Center Problems (Vista Ultimate)
PeterC@NickelCap PeterCNickel...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista security Yep, just uninstalled and reinstalled... same results. OneCare happy. WSC not so happy. Another thing that could be confusing to some users is that WSC shows Defender turned off (which I now understand is normal with

Vista security overview: too little too late
This is stable, secure, reliable yadda yadda in Vista I wonder.......what kludges have been carried over...... No Of course XP was supposed to be sooooo stable......security well think that has been covered enough.... See above, MSGINA is secure and stable The overall view is always more interesting.

Former Micro$oft designer/executive's opinion on Vista security
ness...@wigner.berkeley.edu ness...@wigner.berkeley.edu comp os linux advocacy "Infosec Anti-virus firms at Infosec say they expect Vista and IE7 to change nothing for the industry. Microsoft used its presence at the show to laud the security features they've been busy building in the the upcoming software.

Independent Security Experts Debunk Windows Vista Security
I have ran avast anti-virus and found a trojan in my iexplore.exe and service.exe files. I have attempted to remove them repeatedly and then run another scan but they keep returning. I would like to get my security center back on and under my control. Can someone please help me? I am operating with Windows Vista

Vista Security Center - Firewall Check
"A. Kretschmer" andreas.kretsch...@schollglas.com mailing database pgsql-novice am Mon, dem 03.12.2007, um 14:29:04 -0600 mailte Dale Seaburg folgendes: I am attempting to install 8,2,4 on a Vista PC. I get to the point in the installation, where files have been copied and the installer attempts to create the

Vista security system promises Windows migration headaches
I still wonder why none of those security gurus ever say that connecting several million computers with one network is a bad idea to start with. Or would that put them out of business? More than that, it would go against their earlier statements. Having a mix of OSes is sort of like having a mix of DNA.

Vista security update
Partly because of security progress that Microsoft already had made in its last operating system, Windows XP. Also because a complex product like Vista is Some of Vista's security enhancements require computers with the latest microprocessors -- which are known as 64-bit chips, in reference to how much data